More than 20 countries are convening in Bogota next week to declare “concrete measures against Israel’s violations of international law”, diplomats told Middle East Eye.

The “emergency summit” is due to be held on 15-16 July, co-hosted by the governments of Colombia and South Africa as co-chairs of The Hague Group, to coordinate diplomatic and legal action to counter what they describe as “a climate of impunity” enabled by Israel and its powerful allies.

The founding members of the group included Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa.

States due to take part in the summit include Algeria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Cuba, Djibouti, Honduras, Indonesia, Ireland, Lebanon, Malaysia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Oman, Portugal, Spain, Qatar, Turkey, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Palestine.

  • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    of all these countries that are taking measures against the settler entity, what surprises me is that 1) china didn’t took action before; 2) portugal is taking action despite montenegro; and 3) chile is taking action despite boric.

  • fermionsnotbosons@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    What can we realistically expect from this group?

    It would be great if they could at least sanction Israel and the US in addition to what some of these states are already doing unilaterally, but short of blocking any further shipping of arms (many of these countries are positioned on or near key straits in the region, I guess) what else can they do other than direct conflict or more performative decrees from the same neoliberal-dominated institutions that are currently failing us?

    • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      china could do a whole lot, they just doing the most “we don’t interfere with other people business” smolbean shit imaginable, they are third largest trading partner to entity. Would be nice if they’ve had more spine than colombia

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      One side already has the Western world supporting them. Can’t get much worse if the Global South starts arming the resistance except them being able to fight back.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is objectively the right thing to do and very important, and at the same time, as an American I desperately do not want a proxy war. Donald trump would love to have an excuse to give even more ludicrous amounts of taxpayers dollars to military contractors at a time when no one can afford shit and cost of living is spiking

        I really do not want a proxy war 🥹

        • Prismaarchives@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          would love to have an excuse to give even more ludicrous amounts of taxpayers dollars to military contractors

          The idea that anyone would need an excuse to give military contractors infinite money in this country is the funniest thing I’ve heard all day.

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Fair honestly. I just can’t help but think that having an excuse would make it worse 😅

            Not sure why people are downvoting me for not wanting a proxy war, that seems like a pretty reasonable way to feel as best I can see…

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          The US doesn’t have the industrial capacity, there’s a difference between currency and the actual physical industrialization needed to maintain a proxy war.

      • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        NATO supporters always claim, that as a sovereign nation, Ukraine should have the right to end the war on their own terms. To get together with Russia and say:“If you do this and that, then we’re happy and the fighting ends.” But, oh wait, that already happened years ago in 2022 when Russia and Ukraine practically had an agreement to make peace but NATO caused them to keep fighting. German, Turkish and Israeli mediators who were present at the negotiations all say that’s what happened. As does chief negotiator and leader of the ruling party in the Ukraine, David Arakhamia. They all agree, that NATO influence was what ultimately caused the deal to fall through. Is that what support looks like?

        • narinciye@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Algeria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Cuba, Djibouti, Honduras, Indonesia, Ireland, Lebanon, Malaysia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Oman, Portugal, Spain, Qatar, Turkey, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Uruguay, and Palestine.

          There seems to be no allies of Russia in the list, do i miss something

    • Coding4Fun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am very curious to see how US, the fascist dog of Israel will react to that. More taxes?