Title says it all, really.

Following the investigation, local prosecutors brought charges against two students for theft of advertising services. The little-known statute appears to only exist in Illinois and California, where it was originally passed to prevent the Ku Klux Klan from distributing recruitment materials in newspapers. The statute makes it illegal to insert an “unauthorized advertisement in a newspaper or periodical.” The students, both of whom are Black, now face up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine.

“I have never seen anyone charged with theft of advertising,” said Elaine Odeh, a lawyer who formerly supervised public defenders in Cook County, Illinois, which includes Evanston, where Northwestern is based.

I ask anyone who stands against the ongoing crackdown on the free speech of anti-genocide protestors, or against the disproportionate criminalization of Black people and their speech, or for the freedom of the press and the freedom to parody, to consider signing this student-led change.org petition.

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Cohen v. California comes to mind:

    The Court ultimately found that displaying a mere four-letter word was not sufficient justification for allowing states to restrict free speech and that free speech can be restricted only under severe circumstances beyond offensiveness.

    (bold added for emphasis)

    Hopefully the current case doesn’t make it to this U.S. Supreme Court, the majority of which has little to no respect for legal precedent.

    • cobra89@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly my thought. This should never reach SCOTUS though because this is so objectively unconstitutional that every court should throw it out before it ever even comes to trial.

      • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wonder what the limit is of the prosecutor’s ability to appeal it and if they would be able to appeal it all the way to the supreme Court.

        IANAL

  • S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Huh, too bad the colleges didn’t prepare these people for the real world.

    Maybe they’ll pick up some useful skills while in jail.

    • spider@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      too bad the colleges didn’t prepare these people for the real world.

      Yeah, too bad they learned how to think instead of what to think.

      Maybe they’ll pick up some useful skills while in jail.

      That’s mighty white of you.

        • spider@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          while regurgitating literal terrorist propaganda

          No, it’s satire, and intelligent people can tell the difference.

          Yup, they sure learned how to think by foregoing all critical thinking.

          So “critical thinking” in your view would be…parroting AIPAC propaganda?

          funded by Qatar

          …which has diplomatic relations with Israel. If they funded anti-Israel propaganda, this would not be the case.

          (And the Mossad would certainly know if Qatar was doing that.)

          these people are unemployable

          That’s just your opinion. And you don’t represent employers, so you can’t pretend to speak on their behalf.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    The mock front page featured fake quotes from school officials, accusations of Israeli war crimes, and a fake ad for Birthright Israel — the travel abroad program that sends young American Jews to Israel — with the tagline “One man’s home is another man’s former home!” Overnight, someone had pinned the mock papers on bulletin boards, spread them on desks in lecture halls, and even wrapped the false front pages around roughly 300 copies of the Daily Northwestern itself.

    The Class A misdemeanor charges, the highest level short of a felony, represent an escalation in the battle over free speech and protest on college campuses as the war in Gaza drags into its fifth month.

    Pro-Palestine activism on campus has faced a severe crackdown due to what Israel’s backers say is antisemitism and hate speech, with school administrations working closely with police.

    Several colleges have banned or suspended chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine, a popular pro-Palestine group, including at Columbia University, which subsequently beefed up its police presence.

    Stephanie Kollmann, the policy director of a Northwestern’s law school clinic focused on criminal justice, questioned why SPC chose to go directly to the police rather than issuing a cease-and-desist letter to the students.

    Over 70 student organizations — including high-profile groups like Mayfest Productions, which sponsors an annual music festival on campus — have pledged to not speak with the Daily Northwestern until the charges are dropped.


    Saved 82% of original text.