

If it can’t be done in the GUI, it’s not worth doing. If that includes something a basic user would need, the that’s a failure of the OS.


Exactly the kind of thing our dumbass-in-chief would ban.


2 is not == true, but !!2 is true


It’s still your fault for lying in the first place.


Nope, then you get people complaining that “this is not a dating spot”.


Moving even further away from decentralization


Example code is a form of documentation


Made by people that either:
Because there is not now, nor will there ever be, nor CAN there ever be, an effective AI detection tool.


You think that the bill being completely moronic is a reason congress wouldn’t pass it? Oh sweet summer child…
The internet is growing more hostile to humans… TO READ THIS STORY, SIGN IN OR START A FREE TRIAL.


Not likely, the idiots that voted for this are still out there, and they didn’t learn from the last time either.
It turned into C#
I would, but I don’t think anyone would get it.
It doesn’t, and never will


Incorrect.
Vivaldi, which is Chromium-based, has a built-in ad blocker.


Except Vivaldi has a built-in ad blocker


Safari is also irrelevant, the article is just showing some of the reasons why


Intel comes limping back, hoping that everyone forgets that most recent time they screwed everyone over.
You are correct and most of the commenters here are wrong, UAC is a feature that IS secure without a password and Linux does not have any equivalent.
Windows can safely control privilege escalation through a secure elevated prompt that only the user can interact with.
Because Linux doesn’t have any kind of secure elevated prompt like that, any process could impersonate you to log in as your user if it didn’t have a password, so you just have to have a password on Linux if you want it to be secure.