Ive seen two in the last decade. It’s surprisingly easy to know when it’s totality, and when it ends. Not only are there apps that do countdowns, but your eyes make it very clear if they’re disturbed by light or not.

Totality is incredible. A sight truly indescribable. A different color of white unimaginable, in a ring in the sky, animated like fire. I actually opened this comment section to come post this.

What else should he call someone who is insufferable?

This post isn’t exclusively about deepfakes. It’s about editing someone else’s images. Making suggestive deepfakes is mentioned in the article as an example, but it’s not mentioned in the title or summary here.

That said, my points stand. Don’t post shit online if you don’t want it to be edited.

With the ease of photo manipulation, society has no choice but to adapt to nonsensical, simple edits. It can’t be stopped. There’s hundreds of apps and programs that do this now. Even adobe’s famous suite.

I know you hate Elon, I can hear it in your tone. But this isn’t an Elon thing. Look around.

You’ve totally changed the original post’s topic and made it into something obviously unacceptable. There’s a line to cross with content in general, AI or not, and any public ai model should absolutely have safety rails / content moderation on its output

Using grok this way is the same as a photo editor. It’s the human asking grok to do it that is the problem. Not grok or any other tool. Meta products have this exact same feature.

Grok will not post it publicly unless you click the button to do so. Again, it’s the person that is doing it, not grok.

Omg what horror. Have you discovered that you can click and drag any image from anywhere into photo editing software or ChatGPT or the likes? Whatever shall we do?! We have to make images uneditable somehow. This is a complete tragedy.

For real, why should I care?

source: everything okokimup googled said so

Cmon, don’t post this misleading bullshit

nobody likes Redditors[…]

Huh? Nobody from where?

You really throw a whole segment of the population into a single bucket here. Everyone is unique.

Box is a bad example; it always has a value and can’t be unwrapped. It’s Result<T> and Option<T> that are the primary wrappers.

Result is for Errors, and Option is for nullables. If you consider it that way, the “issues” with unwrap are identical to other languages when errors and nulls aren’t properly handled.

What leads you to believe that?

Are you saying that the current USA administration is in favor of forced child labor, and that link proves it? I don’t see it.

Yeah, it needs a lot more thought put into it because with wildly fluctuating equity prices you run into scenarios where a run up on a security triggers you to have to sell a bunch and give it to the government but then if that security returns right back to the price it was the week before you’re just shit out of luck. Because of that it means people will go to great lengths to find ways to circumvent this because it’s not fair.

I’m not saying it’s a bad idea what I’m saying is that it needs refined and thought through a lot more

In the movies, AI infiltrates through sneaky back doors and stuff. So unrealistic. The reality is that we just give it root access willingly.

Attempt to find mechanical logic in a designer fashion piece at your own peril. Don’t over think it. These shoes are made for style not function.

Like I said, the quote was related to my first paragraph asking the question about personal net worth.

I didn’t then quote the company part as I thought the flow continued logically. It seems I was wrong.

I’m aware of the cap he said, and that’s what I was asking an opinion on.

Thank you for contributing yours.

should probably be weighed against public interest and publicly-funded and managed, if they’re beneficial.

So large skyscrapers, large nuclear plants, datacenters, etc would be state owned. Actually more…. This would be hundreds of the largest companies.
This means the state would commandeer a company when what, the market cap hit a billy? The nav? That actually seems kinda crazy to do

You replied to the post, not my comment. But I found you anyway!

Thanks for the info!

I was referring to the company net worth that was mentioned.

The quote was related to my question.

You can prevent this problem by taking his place!

cap personal netwoths at 10-20 million dollars

how would this work in your utopia? if the value of my investments goes over that, I have to sell them to give cash to the govt?

Seems difficult to raise capital that way. Would you put more large cap projects in the hands of a government? Things like power plants, large buildings, etc? No one could own or finance them since they are worth a lot.