Allegedly the building it struck next to:

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I thought so too, but I think the acceleration is an optical illusion due to the warhead coming in slightly towards the camera. I also don’t recall any ballistic missiles carrying a terminal motor that kicks in that late.

    That’s usually only for cruise missiles. Gravity does a good enough job of giving the warhead speed.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It could certainly be an optical illusion.

      It could be a tactic to confuse anti missile batteries, by firing half a second after apogee. Gravity is fixed/known, but a secondary booster could be fired at different accelerations. Also it would leave less time to intercept

      • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Not sure Iranian missiles are that advanced. Even the Soviet missiles designed to take out supercarriers only had the most basic terminal maneuverability. And those were done by fins. Even the US has only recently caught up with that level of ballistic missile tech by the mid 2000s

        • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It is 2025. Soviet missiles are no longer the most advanced technology and it’s not impossible to imagine that Iran has developed technology better than that of a country that hasn’t existed for 25 years.

          There is much evidence supporting Iran as having missiles capable of maneuvering post launch.