When I tried it in the past, I kinda didn’t take it seriously because everything was confined to its instance, but now, there’s full-featured global search and proper federation everywhere? Wow, I thought I heard there were some technical obstacles making it very unlikely, but now it’s just there and works great! I asked ChatGPT and it says this feature was added 5 years ago! Really? I’m not sure how I didn’t notice this sooner. Was it really there for so long? With flairs showing original instance where video comes from and everything?

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I asked ChatGPT and it says this feature was added 5 years ago! Really?

    How would you phrase this differently?

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      “It looks like this feature was added 5 years ago.”

      If asking for confirmation, just ask for confirmation.

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So, your solution is for the user to provide less information and then respond to people to inform them if they used chatgpt if asked?

        It just seems like much less reps are used if they say they used ChatGPT.

        Additionally, if they don’t say it and no one asks, in the future people might look for a source, at least this way there is a warning there might be misinformation.

        I know what your going to say next, they should research the thing themselves independently of ChatGPT, but honestly, they probably don’t care/have the time to look up released notes over the past few years.

          • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The point Is that it might not be accurate. It’s like saying, “a friend told me…”

            It lets the reader know that the information being shared was presented as truthful, but wasn’t verified by the commenter themselves.

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So, your solution is for the user to provide less information and then respond to people to inform them if they used chatgpt if asked?

        It just seems like much less reps are used if they say they used ChatGPT.

        Additionally, if they don’t say it and no one asks, in the future people might look for a source, at least this way there is a warning there might be misinformation.

        I know what your going to say next, they should research the thing themselves independently of ChatGPT, but honestly, they probably don’t care/have the time to look up released notes over the past few years.