If you can read that, see that they’re on major version 1 with a minor version over 100, and you still think they’re using semver, then that’s on you.
I don’t think they’re using semver. That’s literally what I’m complaining about. I genuinely don’t understand why people here are taking it so hard that I wish the Immich devs were using semver.
As this project is clearly not following semver, the semver guidelines aren’t applicable and haven’t been violated.
Wonderful. Good for them. Good for you. Good for everyone who disagrees with me. Just not for me. And that’s just my opinion, man. And that should be ok with you for me to have it.
I genuinely don’t understand why people here are taking it so hard that I wish the Immich devs were using semver.
Because you didn’t say that; you said “Breaking changes in a point release? Not cool” and later “I’m basing this off the guidelines at semver.org.”
I’m paraphrasing your comments from memory, to be clear, so apologies if I misquoted you.
It certainly felt to me like you were assuming that this project was using semver and was not following it well, not that you wouldn’t want to use a project that receives this many breaking changes / that doesn’t follow semver. Those complaints both make a lot more sense to me - and I’ve seen many people say similar things about Immich in the past. In fact, it’s a big part of why I haven’t migrated from Photoprism to Immich myself - in this regard they’re complete opposites.
I don’t think they’re using semver. That’s literally what I’m complaining about. I genuinely don’t understand why people here are taking it so hard that I wish the Immich devs were using semver.
Wonderful. Good for them. Good for you. Good for everyone who disagrees with me. Just not for me. And that’s just my opinion, man. And that should be ok with you for me to have it.
Because you didn’t say that; you said “Breaking changes in a point release? Not cool” and later “I’m basing this off the guidelines at semver.org.”
I’m paraphrasing your comments from memory, to be clear, so apologies if I misquoted you.
It certainly felt to me like you were assuming that this project was using semver and was not following it well, not that you wouldn’t want to use a project that receives this many breaking changes / that doesn’t follow semver. Those complaints both make a lot more sense to me - and I’ve seen many people say similar things about Immich in the past. In fact, it’s a big part of why I haven’t migrated from Photoprism to Immich myself - in this regard they’re complete opposites.