• Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Rude thing to say about something somebody took the time and made, IMO. Especially considering that there’s literally nothing wrong with the images we’re even talking about. The pictures are just fine.

      This is reminding me of people being critical of artists for using Photoshop.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You knew, sometimes the most skilled artists can still produce shit, and you’re entitled to not enjoy every piece regardless of its technical quality.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I’m not talking about the OP image, I’m talking about boardroom driven, focus tested “entertainment products” that have about as much in common with art as “food products” do with nutrition.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        This different between AI and Photoshop is that Photoshop takes time and skill; you need creativity.

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Sure. But this doesn’t look like AI in the first place. It looks more like a Maya render, if anything.