laws have nothing to do with morality. laws protect the powerful and the at social institutions that made them powerful. the fact that private property laws exist means powerful people depend on private property to maintain power.
Morality is determined by society. Society has not agreed that being a landlord is immoral.
Very few people want to eliminate rentals altogether. You can go look at polls, even the polls where you find the most support for restrictions only want secondary rental homes to be taxed higher.
can you tell me what ethical system says morality determined by society? it’s been a few years since my philosophy degree, and it wasn’t specialized in ethics, but I seem to remember moral relativism as being universally appalling.
so you’re saying it’s just straight up moral relativism, a theory of ethics that doesn’t actually allow any questioning of morality, like divine command theory.
At the time, yes, trying to run a commercial farm without slaves while you tried to get the laws changed would have been completely reasonable.
Morality is not absolute, its situational and relative. Applying modern morals to judge the past is an effort in stupidity.
“I wouldn’t have done that” yes you definitely would have, because you would have been raised to do that.
There are things you do today that future generations will judge you as immoral for doing that you think are perfectly fine.
Do you think eating animals is acceptable? Future generations may think you just as barbaric for allowing that as you think people were for allowing human slaves. Or maybe they’re fine with eating meat, but they will think you barbaric for allowing paid healthcare to exist and people to suffer because they’re poor.
Your argument is weak.
There’s already a law that says “Murder is bad, go to Jail” so no it’s not fine, and society deemed it morally incorrect.
Society has not yet agreed that renting to people is morally incorrect, that’s why it’s still legal and why millions of people are landlords.
laws have nothing to do with morality. laws protect the powerful and the at social institutions that made them powerful. the fact that private property laws exist means powerful people depend on private property to maintain power.
Morality is determined by society. Society has not agreed that being a landlord is immoral.
Very few people want to eliminate rentals altogether. You can go look at polls, even the polls where you find the most support for restrictions only want secondary rental homes to be taxed higher.
can you tell me what ethical system says morality determined by society? it’s been a few years since my philosophy degree, and it wasn’t specialized in ethics, but I seem to remember moral relativism as being universally appalling.
“universally appalling” despite it literally having supporters arguing over it for over a thousand years…
Just because your class of idealist youth didn’t like it doesn’t make it universally appalling.
this isn’t an answer
Your question didn’t require an answer, since it answered itself.
so you’re saying it’s just straight up moral relativism, a theory of ethics that doesn’t actually allow any questioning of morality, like divine command theory.
That’s only one variation of moral relativism. It is, as most things in ethics are, not black and white.
Lol. Slavery was morally correct because it was legal too I’m guessing?
At the time, yes, trying to run a commercial farm without slaves while you tried to get the laws changed would have been completely reasonable.
Morality is not absolute, its situational and relative. Applying modern morals to judge the past is an effort in stupidity.
“I wouldn’t have done that” yes you definitely would have, because you would have been raised to do that.
There are things you do today that future generations will judge you as immoral for doing that you think are perfectly fine.
Do you think eating animals is acceptable? Future generations may think you just as barbaric for allowing that as you think people were for allowing human slaves. Or maybe they’re fine with eating meat, but they will think you barbaric for allowing paid healthcare to exist and people to suffer because they’re poor.
I don’t eat animals btw
Gtfo slavery apologist