Was surprised no one bothered to post this give how big of a reaction this story got.

Wanted to post the update and correction cause that deserves to be seen just as much. This seems like a reasonable, thoughtful handling of the issue.

I still don’t really wanna use Ubuntu though 😅

  • Irdial@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Honestly, I don’t think Snaps are so bad. Canonical’s top market is enterprise, and Snaps are ideal for deploying applications in these environments. If you’re an end-user, you can literally just uninstall the runtime

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Snaps are bad for two reasons:

      1. The backend is proprietary & the client doesn’t support other backends without modifying the source code
      2. For some packages, doing apt install installs the Snap instead

      There’s no good reason for either. Canonical is simply setting things up so they can squeeze money out of their users by enshittifying over time.