The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is “If you disagree with me, you will be banned”

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You are intended to moderate via votes. But I hope you don’t feel that something you disagree with needs to be “moderated”. Other people are allowed to disagree with you, it doesn’t require moderation.

    • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Right that’s what I’m saying, I don’t understand why voting buttons are there except for users to use them to moderate each other. I don’t feel like they’re necessary at all. I participated in online discussions for 25 years before reddit showed up. We didn’t need voting buttons at all and the presence of those buttons removes nuance and complexity from the conversation.

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        They’re there so the frontpage isn’t a disordered mess where nonsense posts aren’t given equal weight to meaningful news stories.

        • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You can do this by displaying the threads in the order they were last bumped and pruning / deleting them by the last time they were bumped (age) or thread limit per board, in other words, based on participation. …you don’t need voting buttons.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            in the order they were last bumped

            This does not work at all. There are many threads being participated in all the time on all kinds of communities. If we did it this way, we would get a new set of posts on the front page every time you refresh, simply because 20 comments had been posted in 20 threads that just happen to be the newest comments. This model of last bump only works if activity is fairly low.

          • Skavau@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That’s still disordered and just encourages people to bump their own threads.

            The upvote/downvote system is foundational to sites like this. Short of a new, more advanced voting system (which is a long way out) it’s not going anywhere. If you don’t want to look at it like that, you can always default all of your own feeds and threads to /new/.

            • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              That’s still disordered and just encourages people to bump their own threads.

              Not if posting in your own thread doesn’t bump it.

              • Skavau@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Okay, well that might be a good suggestion for /active/.

                But in any case you already have your own tools for what you want.