schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to xkcd@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前Could the Hubble take a photo of you?www.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down12
arrow-up129arrow-down1external-linkCould the Hubble take a photo of you?www.youtube.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to xkcd@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前message-square3fedilink
minus-squarechonkyninja@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 天前No, but there’s much better satellites that can get down to about a marble.
minus-squarefayoh@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 天前Not saying that we don’t build technically better satellites today compared to Hubble. But Hubble is just not made to image the earth. Just like Hubble cannot take a good picture of the earth, the satellites that do will not take an image of the crab nebula comparable to Hubble. Right tool for the right job.
minus-squareOnomatopoeia@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 天前Interestingly, we have Hubble in part because spy agencies had spare Keyhole Satellite chassis.
No, but there’s much better satellites that can get down to about a marble.
Not saying that we don’t build technically better satellites today compared to Hubble. But Hubble is just not made to image the earth.
Just like Hubble cannot take a good picture of the earth, the satellites that do will not take an image of the crab nebula comparable to Hubble.
Right tool for the right job.
Interestingly, we have Hubble in part because spy agencies had spare Keyhole Satellite chassis.