• EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would love to see hosts start offering subscription based instances and do things like paying for regular auditing of their infrastructure to give us some assurance that our data is actually secure.

    I’d legitimately pay for that.

      • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Regular auditing of the infrastructure" seems like a very enterprise-y thing to expect from a basic SaaS.

        That’s the entire point. Offer a premium service when compared to the alternatives and you get to bring in revenue.

        Currently, every instance essentially makes a pinky promise that our data isn’t being used maliciously. An audit provides assurances they are.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          You didn’t respond the second part: how much are you willing to pay for this? Anything less than $100k/year and I will guarantee you there is no serious provider who will care about being certified for it, and any who is willing to pay that much money surely will be better off by running their instance on their own.

          • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Of course I didn’t respond to it. Because it has nothing to do with my point. Im not going to go out there and do extensive business research just to satisfy your weird demand.

            It’s something I’d like to see someone take on. It’s something I’d wager other people would like to see take on. The economic viability I leave to anyone that wants to take it on.