• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    That’s called stealing. And that book they claim to have read says that’s a no no.

    Also your library will just buy more copies. Which means your taxes will go up to pay for the missing books.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Also your library will just buy more copies. Which means your taxes will go up to pay for the missing books.

      Lolno. Libraries are getting funds cut. They will not buy a new copy, it will become unavailable, then those that would go to a library to borrow it no longer can, so they find it online, and the right can say “see? Nobody goes to libraries anyways”.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Our libraries send an invoice to the people who have unpaid dues.

        And they can’t loan anything before the dues have been paid.

        Might even go to collections if you’re enough of an ass

        • papalonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          Our libraries have mostly moved away from this model. I may have some details mixed up but I believe there was a study done that showed books were more likely to be returned without the late fee than with a fee.

          Basically people will feel ashamed or embarrassed to return a book so late (or maybe in extreme cases cannot easily afford the couple dollars) so they end up stealing the book and never returning it. So now the library has to buy a $10 book because someone couldn’t pay the $5 late fee. It just makes more sense in the long run to let people bring the book back late without penalty vs not bring it back at all in fear of a fee.