I took your ‘age verification thing’ as referring to the on line safety act, which came into effect in July. This investigation pre-dates that, and isn’t about the verification part. Which is why my reply started with “No, …”. But it is about the same ‘protect the children’ stuff.
oh okay. this confused me even more, so i found out that the planned fine is because of
Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gzxv5gy3qo
I took your ‘age verification thing’ as referring to the on line safety act, which came into effect in July. This investigation pre-dates that, and isn’t about the verification part. Which is why my reply started with “No, …”. But it is about the same ‘protect the children’ stuff.
I see. I didn’t know that. Thanks for clearing that up.