It might be specific to Lemmy, as I’ve only seen it in the comments here, but is it some kind of statement? It can’t possibly be easier than just writing “th”? And in many comments I see “th” and “þ” being used interchangeably.

  • CTDummy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why not have both

    Apart from it being redundant, superseded by th and annoying to read? It being hard to type has never been a complaint that I’ve seen about it.

    • falcunculus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      One of the biggest criticisms of English is how reading a word doesn’t teach one how it is pronounced. So it’s not redundant since it addresses an actual problem.

      It was indeed superseded but that doesn’t mean it disappearing was good. Limitations of printing were involved.

      It is annoying to read because you’re not used to it. Were you used to it, you’d think “th” annoying. By your logic, everything you’re not already used to is automatically bad.

      It being hard to type was a question from OP.