I asked him “what color were the clouds back then?” and he said they were white. I asked him what happens if I take an orange light and light up something that’s white with it. He ignored me. He went on about how everyone in his age group remembers the Sun being orange, and by me questioning him, I’m calling him and all his peers liars and I’m stupid because I’m younger than him and vaccinated.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    LED chips can’t get above 150 °C or they fail. So high-power LED lights need appropriate cooling. And the heatsink is big and thermally conductive, making it feel hotter to the touch than it is (it delivers more heat to your finger over time). Meanwhile, the glass of some bulbs can exceed 300 °C but cools down to safe levels in a minute (or less if you touch it with something) because it’s thin.

    Also, 150 °C (420 K) objects do radiate heat as black-body radiation but not that much, also it’s far-IR so only detectable with thermal cameras. Meanwhile, a light bulb’s filament is 2700 K (3000 K in halogen ones) and the Sun’s surface is 6000 K, and both produce copious amounts of near-IR light that largely contributes to the heat felt on one’s skin when illuminated (although the visible light does too).

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        From a human’s standpoint, we say they’re “hot”. The fact that humans can’t handle 150 °C nor 2700 °C does not mean there’s no difference between the temperature of a sausage fresh off the grill and magma. (Yes, by the time it gets to the surface, lava is too cold)

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Boiling hot, as opposed to METAL-MELTING REMOTELY-SCORCHING HELL-BLAZING INFERNO

            How long before you admit there is a point to calling them “cold light sources” because their color temperature is higher than what black body radiation (incandesce) can do?

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Try so hard to desperately disprove my point, and you fail so catastrophically that you fall into the low hanging trap that is my username.

                  Congrats for playing yourself.

                  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    I’m trying to get you to stop reducing temperature scale to “anything over 60 °C is hot” because it’s not useful: a clearer distinction should be made between something that regularly causes house fires and something I unscrew while it’s on to put under my blanket when my toes are cold. Human perception of temperature (classic 0-100 °F) just does not allow comparing things an order of magnitude higher (in Kelvin ofc). There’s also more to heat, its effects and how it’s perceived than a single measurement of temperature: thermal mass, conductivity, color (exchange via radiation differs between black and white bodies) etc.

                    Also, it’s indeed ad hominem but you did choose the username yourself.