I’m choosing devices based on how good they work with zha and HA and usually have to browse a bit before settling for something. If they manage to implement this properly, I’m all here for it.

Maybe they should talk to the zigbee device compatibility repository people (or maybe they already have).

  • turmacar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Saying “my point is valid” does not make an argument valid. You’re presenting as a 2nd year computer science student who is mad because they just learned that Microsoft is less than trustworthy. Who read an article about toxoplasmosis recently.

    Most of the devices connecting to Home Assistant are using air gapped, non-wifi networks. A lot of them don’t have a TCP/IP stack, much less a radio capable of connecting to the internet.

    Home Assistant is an open source project. It’s not a thing constructed by a company for sale. You are in a lemmy instance talking about it, which is why the people reading a post about a version update to it, know what it is.

    Yes, there could be a magical way for “them” to secretly gather data on everything you do. But at that point they don’t need the smart devices.

    • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You are in a lemmy instance talking about it, which is why the people reading a post about a version update to it, know what it is.

      Not to mention that this post is specifically in the Home Assistant-community, which describes the FOSS, local control and privacy aspects of it in the community description.