Jeremy Scahill and Murtaza Hussain
Feb 18, 2026

A former senior U.S. intelligence official who is an informal advisor to the Trump administration on Middle East policy told Drop Site that, based on his discussions with current officials, he assesses an 80-90% likelihood of U.S. strikes within weeks.

Iran realizes that it is facing an unprecedented threat from the U.S. if a deal that conforms with Trump’s terms is not reached, former Pentagon official Jasmine El-Gamal told Drop Site. “This is not a dress rehearsal,” she said. “This is it. This is not the negotiations of last year or the year before or the year before that. They’re backed into a corner. There’s no off ramp.”

  • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    They ‘goaded them’? They started torturing and killing all opposition the very day they took power. Didn’t need any help for that

    • choui4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Again, this is not me advocating for the regime. However, as an anti-imperiliast, I can hope that the people of Iran make changes to their government on their own, without 2000 lb palestinian child murder bombs from the usa

        • choui4@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I think, considering the totality of the circumstances eg: what america will do/does across the globe; they have a greater chance on their own, of being free, than with the “”““help””“” of the usa

          • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I think the people have a better chance if the regime is busy with another enemy, yes

            Sad it has to be the US but I don’t think they have any other chance

            • Wakmrow [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              This is laughable. You should listen to citations needed, they just did an episode about this idiotic “logic”. No, bombing a country to pieces is not fucking helping the people living there.

              • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                What makes you think they’ll ‘bomb Iran to pieces’? Last time they just concentrated on military and enrichment plants. What motivation do you think they have to bomb civilians?

                  • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    Did they bomb either of those countries to pieces? I must have missed that.

                    Or do you mean ground invasions? Do you believe Trump is secretly planning an invasion and are you equating that to ‘bomb to pieces’?

                  • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 days ago

                    Well sadly, it’s hard to take them out without any civilian casualties.

                    The way I see it Iran is around 5 million people suppressing the other 85.

                    Sorry to put it so blunt but even if takes 5 million innocents to free the other 80 (and their future)… it’s worth it.

    • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I think countries should bomb the USA as they have ice concentration camps. And while they do so I hope that the civilian deaths are people like you

          • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Hoping for people to die is a bit of a key difference though

            And not picking those that support ICE in your wonderful example tells us even more

            • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              Unlike you, I recognize that civilian deaths are inevitable when another country attacks another country with a shit pretext. And not only did I say the pretext to attack the US is it having ice concentration camps, it is more just than your US manufactured pretext to attack Iran). Fuck off dipshit

              • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                You should add more swearing, it really adds to how serious you are about hoping to see me die

                If you think ICE is worse I believe you don’t have a clue about the situation in Iran though

                • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  If you think Iran should be bombed because they are reactionary and commit attrocities then you’re one of those useful idiots that cheer on imperialism. Lick that boot harder. The attrocities the US did inside and outside their border dwarfs anything Iran did (ICE concentration camps is not the worst the US did by a long shot)

                  • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    Do you think we should give up on the Iranian people because the US committed atrocities?

                    Also, could you give a more graphical description of how you hope to see me die?