muhyb@programming.dev to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agoMoving out so found one of my older archives. You can guess how old it is.i.ibb.coimagemessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down12
arrow-up1224arrow-down1imageMoving out so found one of my older archives. You can guess how old it is.i.ibb.comuhyb@programming.dev to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareSCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 hours ago2000 was a quarter of a century ago.
minus-squareMagnum, P.I.@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 hours agoThanks, calculating the years that past since 2000 is always the hardest for me.
minus-squarejambudz@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 hours agoExactly. Like 1997 on, but fuck I was 3 when it came out. But they became popular around 2002 according to some variety article, and surpassed vhs in 2003. Wild the players were $800 when they first came out.
minus-squareMagnum, P.I.@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoDVD+R or RW was merely a research project in the late 90s - having those on the shelve is more like 2001-2003
DVDs? Cant be that old.
2000 was a quarter of a century ago.
Thanks, calculating the years that past since 2000 is always the hardest for me.
Exactly. Like 1997 on, but fuck I was 3 when it came out. But they became popular around 2002 according to some variety article, and surpassed vhs in 2003. Wild the players were $800 when they first came out.
DVD+R or RW was merely a research project in the late 90s - having those on the shelve is more like 2001-2003