Apparently this will include Linux…

  • Archr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You are right that operating system is not defined. But the definition of operating system provider is this: “(g) “Operating system provider” means a person or entity that develops, licenses, or controls the operating system software on a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device.” (emphasis mine)

    Which should clearly exclude embedded devices.

    https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043

    • wer2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      But embedded computing devices these days are regularly general computing devices, and have been for a long time. If my insert appliance x with an ARM processor isn’t a general computing device, then why is my raspberry pi?

      • Archr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That is not something I had considered, I fully agree.

        So many devices are built around SBCs running linux. I guess my first thought was that it is more about how the device is used and not what that actual OS is. But then how would the OS even be able to tell the difference.

        This is a distinction that they should have spelled out explicitly in the law.

        • wer2@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          They basically defined curl as an app store: “facilitates the download of applications”