Apparently this will include Linux…

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Doesn’t even make sense. Virtually all Linux distros can function completely offline. How do you do age verification completely offline? Classic politician who doesn’t understand tech trying to look like they’re doing something to save the kids.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      "(1) Provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store.

      Sounds like it’s a text box that enter input into. Making it completely pointless.

      • toynbee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        According to Gabe Newell, something like 90% of steam users were both on 1/1/99 (might be fudging the numbers somewhat but presumably you get the idea).

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      The only platforms for now where this might work are Windows, macOS, iOS, and stock Android, however as Muta hypothesized, if this extends to hardware-level, a law could just mandate SecureBoot and lock out the ability to implement custom keys, and then only allow a short list of state-approved OSes to boot on the hardware, which no doubt Windows would be on that short list.

      Similarly, all non-Apple mobile devices as an extension to that could be locked exclusively to stock Android, eliminating custom ROMs like LineageOS or GrapheneOS as an option entirely, let alone mobile Linux distros.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That seems as reasonable as suggesting they could pass a law requiring everyone to hire a govt licensed computer user in order to interact with their devices, and otherwise touching a keyboard or touchscreen would be illegal.

        It doesn’t feel like a realistic estimation of what they would actually try to do. There’s too much that is currently dependent on Linux, you’d do better to just dismantle and ban the internet.

        • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          50 minutes ago

          Another thing that could hypothetically be done given NK does this already so there’s precedent as far as this goes, is any given government could make their own Red Star OS equivalent, and then have that as the only state-approved distro

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Me, buying cellphone parts from another state to assemble myself like an 80% lower to avoid having to drink a Verification Can every time somebody calls me:

        I think I just invented the concept of a “ghost phone”