• Stormy@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I wonder if there are safe guards to stop a bot army from impacting the discourse, or if it’s just because it’s a less known platform.

      • Deebster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I think any federated service is more vulnerable, because there’s no central oversight of e.g. IPs used to create accounts.

        Even without any code, you could easily register accounts at the 20 largest instances and upvote yourself. I’m sure some people will have done just that.

        • Stormy@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Nah i saw some infections earlier today on few politcal posts. It was just blatantly calling ukrainians nazis and 2022 style Russian disinfo, and rt.com news. I got in trouble for reporting it by the admins, and was belittled by the crowd.

          • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I mean the purpose of disinformation is to create disinformed people, so unless they have a very conspicuous activity history, idk why people assume any account posting that stuff is a bot

    • inari@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’ll only hold true while the platform is not popular, unfortunately

      • Twinklebreeze @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I don’t think the platform will ever be popular. Picking an instance is a big enough barrier to entry to stop most people.