• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Isn’t it obvious?

    Instead of having government rely on tech companies, it should just build its own solutions.

    And those solutions would be open source and use open source dependencies.

    It would then have a budget to donate to different projects given that it saves time by using other foss software.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I think a good compromise is to include an open source maintenance fee on projects when used in a corporate or for-profit environment. Another option I like is to offer business support as a subscription.

      It doesn’t need to be super-expensive, but at least that would ensure some continuity for development.

    • biocoder.ronin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No thanks.

      Id rather never install something the government shipped “here ya go!”

      And I think you’re an idiot for suggesting that it would be okay

      • orc girly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Lol they meant the government should use FOSS, which would also be FOSS, so you’d be able to audit it and all even if you wanted to use their software (which you wouldn’t need to unless you worked for the government)