This thought came to me in the shower today. Open source checks most of the boxes. It is a collaborative, worker owned (develloper-owned) project, that tries to flatten hierarchy. Especially if you look at something like Debian ), which really tries to have a bottom-up structure.
Of course, there are exceptions, considering there are a lot of corporate open-source projects, that are not democratically maintained and clearly only serve the interest of the company, who created it (like chromium for example).
So I am mainly talking about community-oriented FOSS projects here.
And if you were to agree with my statement, would you say that developing FOSS software is advancing the goals of the anarchist / communist project, because it is laying the groundwork infrastructure needed for a new kind of economy and society?
Thought this could be an interesting discussion!

  • flora_explora@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I spent hours every day either taking pictures of organisms or identifying them online, just for the sake of it and without financial reimbursement. People who say you need a profit motive to do work are just passionless and detached from the world…

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      People who say you need a profit motive to do work are just passionless and detached from the world…

      You might even say they’re feeling alienated, as a certain German economist might say.