petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-213 hours agoGNOME 50 has been releasedrelease.gnome.orgexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1142arrow-down15
arrow-up1137arrow-down1external-linkGNOME 50 has been releasedrelease.gnome.orgpetsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-213 hours agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·1 day agoHonestly, not much changed since GNOME 40. Is it a bad thing? No Do I want more changes? Also no The only thing missing from GNOME for me is proper dynamic tiling. I’m trying Forge extension, but it feels clunky
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·13 hours agoHow many people were using X11 on GNOME? Yes, it’s technically a huge change, but regular user won’t see a difference
minus-squarepetsoi@discuss.tchncs.deOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-212 hours agoRemoving technical debts cannot be overestimated.
minus-squaremaster_of_unlocking@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·24 hours agoYeah forge is what I use too and it’s definitely a little clunky. PaperWM was decent last time I tried it too (but still a little clunky)
minus-squarejcruz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 hours agoMosaicwm is great, even if still on early development.
Honestly, not much changed since GNOME 40.
Is it a bad thing? No
Do I want more changes? Also no
The only thing missing from GNOME for me is proper dynamic tiling. I’m trying Forge extension, but it feels clunky
Did you ever use Material Shell?
Dropping X11 seems huge.
How many people were using X11 on GNOME?
Yes, it’s technically a huge change, but regular user won’t see a difference
Removing technical debts cannot be overestimated.
Yeah forge is what I use too and it’s definitely a little clunky. PaperWM was decent last time I tried it too (but still a little clunky)
Mosaicwm is great, even if still on early development.
I must check it out, thanks