There really should be consequences for top leadership when even 1% of the company has to go.
I’m a businessperson. When you lay off a bunch of people it’s not because you suddenly discovered smarter ways to work in your industry.
95% of the time, It’s because you planned poorly.
5% of the time, events that could not have been planned for derail things.
If the workers have to suffer consequences for the organization to survive, fine. Take out the leadership who sent the company down the tubes with their orders in the first place.
16k souls about to lay for his continued mistakes https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/meta-job-layoffs-artificial-intelligence-b2938715.html
There really should be consequences for top leadership when even 1% of the company has to go. I’m a businessperson. When you lay off a bunch of people it’s not because you suddenly discovered smarter ways to work in your industry.
95% of the time, It’s because you planned poorly. 5% of the time, events that could not have been planned for derail things.
If the workers have to suffer consequences for the organization to survive, fine. Take out the leadership who sent the company down the tubes with their orders in the first place.
but unfortunately mark has complete control and his board has no power
100% agreed