The Finnish (or Nordic) system operates on the principle on rehabilitating inmates by reintegrating them into society, they do not confine them to a “typical” prison cell like those common in America (instead it’s akin to a college dorm with amenities). There are videos talking about the Nordic prison system you can look up to get the picture.

It’s the same with Norway: as they know that “keeping inmates in a cage beating and abusing them” doesn’t help, instead rehabilities them. (Look up Halden Prison) I mean, why is it that Finland manages to maintain a low recidivism rate while it barely scratches that in the United States?

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    while it barely scratches that in the United States?

    Because they just want to make money from prisons.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yup. Punishment vs rehabilitation is often the focus cited, but it’s more accurate to evaluate it on a scale of public necessity vs profit generator. There’s a reason why US has the biggest proportion of incarceration: It’s a system that is working as intended, and the rehabilitation vs punishment aspect is an afterthought.

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s a system that is working as intended,

        You make it sound like something good LOL

        From an outside perspective, it is outrageous. Ratio of incarceration or other statistics are poor indicators of why such a system is far from good or decent or human…

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Oh no. I get what they were saying.

          It was never intended to be good. It IS working as intended and that is definitely not a good thing.