Anarchy is a political structure where there’s basically no one in charge, right? But wouldn’t that just create a power vacuum that would filled by organized crime, corporations, etc.? Then, after that power vacuum is filled, we’re right back at square one, and someone is in charge.

Are there any political theorists that have come up with a solution to this problem?

  • Telex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    2 minutes in, the biggest gang in the area would already have declared themselves the ruler, ending anarchy. But yes.