Anarchy is a political structure where there’s basically no one in charge, right? But wouldn’t that just create a power vacuum that would filled by organized crime, corporations, etc.? Then, after that power vacuum is filled, we’re right back at square one, and someone is in charge.

Are there any political theorists that have come up with a solution to this problem?

  • Asofon@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You think the red A stands for Anarchism?

    Also you’re clearly not reading what I wrote so, not much point in replying further. I already covered the points you attempt to make.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The initiative was started by Draconic Neo, who made the post is irrelevant.

      I’ve read what you’ve said, and it’s clear you’re a dishonest shitstirrer than anyone with a legitimate complaint based on why factually happened.