Anarchy is a political structure where there’s basically no one in charge, right? But wouldn’t that just create a power vacuum that would filled by organized crime, corporations, etc.? Then, after that power vacuum is filled, we’re right back at square one, and someone is in charge.

Are there any political theorists that have come up with a solution to this problem?

  • Asofon@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    oooor, they know that they can demand my (and every other admin’s) recall, and the fact that they haven’t proves they just trust us.

    Of all the political people, you think it’s anarchists that would be loathe to call out bad power structures? Are you sure this is the argument you want to run with?

    Again, effort. Why bother with yet another power tripping admin when they can just hop on to another instance (or ideally, save their energy to actually do something meaningful in real life). It’s just a niche online forum run by neurodivergents.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      True. It just so happens that all the other anarchist instances also happen to like us. Funny how that works, huh?