• Shayeta@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Which is why this regulation is targeting the very reason why for-profit companies are bothering with data collection?

    • ptsdstillinmymind @lemmy.studio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      All data collection is a problem, because why isn’t the user getting paid. The corpos are making bank off the data, the users should get a majority of that slice.

      • zero_iq@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Users get a service, so it can be argued they are paid in kind. That’s the price of their “free” services.

        Whether you agree with that or not, websites are unlikely to pay users to use their services (unless they’re at least providing content) any more than a coffee shop would pay its customers to drink their coffee.

        • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s non negotiable. I’m always going to use every tool I can to block tracking networks.

          If they respond by not letting me use the service… that’s fine I’ll find a competitor. But in my experience that’s pretty rare. Usually they’re happy to let people use their service even if they can’t track some people.

          The only real road block I’ve ever seen is occasionally a service will ask me to prove I’m not a robot. I rarely bother with proof - just close the tab and switch to an alternative that doesn’t do that garbage.

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          An individuals data is only valuable to someone looking to harm that person

          The aggregate data is what is valuable, and for that they need to be stealing it from everyone at once