Sure, the very first iPhone released today, but does anyone remember the first Android smartphone?

In October of 1998 HTC’s T-Mobile G1, or HTC Dream as it’s known outside the U.S would launch being the first phone with the Android OS. The G1 was priced at $179 — which was pretty affordable even in those days — and featured top-of-the-line specs including a Qualcomm MSM7201A processor, 192MB of RAM, and 256MB of internal storage (expandable up to 16GB). It also stocked a 3.15MP rear camera, and a 1,150mAh battery.

    • drcouzelis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      YES. I turned off all auto-correct and spellcheck and whatever on my Nokia N900, I didn’t need it, I just TYPED. It was so easy!

      And it had Shift, Ctrl, and arrow keys… I miss it so much.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. I’ll never stop blaming Steve Jobs’ hate of physical keys and practicality in favor of looks. Fuck him, but above all, fuck all the competitors that jumped on the “EVERYTHING ON THE SCREEN” bandwagon.

      • snowbell@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I recall seeing physical keyboards on at least one phone that still let you swipe text.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that’s fine. I just miss there being choices. I get that the hinges increased costs, but dammit, why can’t we just have some expensive phones with hinges and let people choose?

    • donio@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We had actual form-factor innovation back then, for a while phone designs still dared to try something besides the slab. Some real work went into that G1 slider mechanism.

    • Erk@cdda.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What surprises me is that no one has made a phone case that integrates a flip or slide keyboard. It would be an easy way to add an aftermarket physical board to a phone, and from these threads it’s clear there’s at least some demand. I understand it’s probably not enough demand for a whole phone line, but surely something like that would be possible.

      When I lived in Japan I had a lovely flip phone with a nice big screen (for the time), no thicker than my cased pixel phone now when closed. The only clamshells that are left have comically tiny screens and are thicker than a fully loaded wallet. They’re substantially less functional than what I used in 2007. It’s bizarre.

      • lackthought@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        years ago they used to have phone cases with a bluetooth keyboard so you could slide it open and it would be pretty similar to having a keyboard integrated right in the phone

        must not have been popular cause I don’t really see them anymore

    • Art [he/him] 🌈@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same! I really miss physical keyboards.

      My thumbs are slightly deformed so I have these thick calluses on the sides that one normally uses to type on the screen. The screen sensors don’t really like that, typing on the phone is an ordeal.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think about that! Our mobile technologies have been becoming less and less accessible as they’ve all settled into the same form factor of big screens with few to no buttons

        • Art [he/him] 🌈@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed. I’ve also seen it with my older relatives. They have a lot of trouble with touch screens, the tiny fonts, minimalist icons, etc.

          A lot of the things that feel “intuitive” for some designers, are so because of the history associated with it, and not everyone knows that history.

          • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            User studies with people not familiar with existing computer metaphors are always so interesting. It always leads to novel computing experiences completely divergent from the classical desktop metaphor. In many ways, we’ve outgrown the desktop metaphor and could start coming up with better and more captivating machine interactions if we just divorced ourselves from the concept. I don’t really have any good suggestions for what to do about it, but I often think about the hamburger menu icon. That shit doesn’t make sense. You see it everywhere because everyone’s settled on it, but if you were told “make a website that people who aren’t familiar with websites can use and enjoy” you would never use that stupid icon

            • Art [he/him] 🌈@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              oh my god I was going to mention specifically the hamburger icon but I got distracted! lol

              Yeah, I never understood where that came from.

              These analogies are so interesting, because they can stick for generations even when they stopped making sense. I had never thought much of it until I read Sapiens and the author points out that we’re still using steam engine analogies in our speech.