There is no rule against anarchism, why was I banned?

Also I don’t support the unibombers methods, I am just an anarchist. This goes against the ideas of 196, where the only rule is that you have to post before you leave. @threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone and other mods, I am very upset

      • Knighthawk 0811@lemmy.one
        81·
        1 year ago

        yeah, but if you’re an anarchist then I just don’t get it. how can you hold someone to a rule or have any opinion on the quality of the rules when you’ve already decided that all rules are stupid and you’re not following any of them (unless you maybe are just following some in order to stay out of jail because reality exists outside of our internal priorities)

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          51·
          1 year ago

          What a stupid fucking take.

          Anarchism is a stateless society without hierarchy. It’s not a society without rules, people can mutually agree to live within a social framework.

        • loiakdsf@discuss.tchncs.de
          21·
          1 year ago

          that point doesn‘t really hold its worth. a murderer‘s house cannot be searched without a warrant just because he is a murderer, he still has a right to privacy, which police need to keep.

          according to your take, police are allowed to search every self proclaimed anarchists houses.

          • Knighthawk 0811@lemmy.one
            2·
            1 year ago

            what? no. That would require that the governing body of the police were itself anarchist… which is a paradox.

            however, if the police did that then said anarchist would have to follow the establishment’s rules in order to fight back and win. If said anarchist were always 100% true to their beliefs then they would not go the route of abiding the laws because they are against the establishment in every way. they would want to fight back, but not by following the rules.

            in your scenario, you made the police out to be anarchists themselves which is a bit backward. the police are fascist, or any other totalitarianism or similar.

  • faceless@lemmy.worldOP
    134·
    1 year ago

    I don’t agree with terrorism, I’m stupid but not that stupid. Ted kazinski was an awful man who bombed post offices, why would I ever agree with that?

    There’s also no way to message mods to talk to them about this, they dont have an email or anything.

        • Quit_this_instance@sh.itjust.works
          16·
          1 year ago

          Well, this c is specifically for discussion of this instance, and you’re having problems on a different instance. If you’re getting nowhere talking to the mods of that specific community you could try looking for a meta community on that instance to talk about it. Lemmy.world has nothing to do with moderation in a different community on a different instance.

        • eric5949@lemmy.world
          12·
          1 year ago

          Probably on the instance the community is on. See if that instance has a chat or general community.

    • indite@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      24·
      1 year ago

      I agree with terrorism if its funny

      Like imagine blowing up a building and having confetti come out after

      Comedy gold

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    12·
    1 year ago

    For starters…for an anarchist it’s strange you’re a stickler for the rules

    But also it’s always going to be an unspoken rule that the mods can ban you from a site at their discretion. That’s why moderation is done by people and not automated (mostly), because there’s always going to be exceptions and things that weren’t accounted for.

    As others have said you just kindof have to read the room sometimes.

  • half@lemmy.world
    1830·
    1 year ago

    Try not to take it too personally: the commies are extra sensitive at the moment because they have to share the fediverse with a giant influx of liberals. You’d probably be upset if they were pouring into your space. Not that anybody owns it, but we all take things for granted. It’ll cool off.