• casey is remote@social.freetalklive.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    @BrikoX

    > A controversial fundraising campaign to help the family of the policeman who killed teenager Nahel M. in France has topped €1 million.

    If it’s so controversial, how did it top €1 million?

    “Controversial” means “we disapprove” in #MSM-speak.

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to Libération, Messiha first tried to launch the campaign on French fund-raising platform Leetchi, but his effort was blocked after a few hours as the company asked for official documentation.

      Part of the reason it’s controversial is right here. Europe’s main fund-raising platform denied the officer the opportunity to fundraise. He had to turn to US company GoFundMe to make the fundraiser. This also means that US political operatives may be donating to the cause. Isn’t that a case of US people trying to influence French politics? Especially considering the US has one of the worst, most violent police gangs in the world?

      • casey is remote@social.freetalklive.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @dingus Interesting, I could see why foreigners donating could inflate the popularity of the cause. But do people in the #USA really care that much? Most English language coverage of the event has been both poor and scant, especially here in the #USA. I had to translate French language news outlets to figure out what actually happened

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had very little trouble finding english language sources for information on this incident.

          Secondly, yes, people in the US do care that much. Maybe not every US citizen, you’re right, a lot of them won’t even know that this happened or be paying attention. Yet…


          Conservative groups, especially Evangelical Christian conservative groups, have a long history of dumping absolutely gobs of money into foreign countries to influence their politics.

          Two recent examples would be the Canadian Trucker Protest,

          https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/how-american-right-wing-funding-for-canadian-trucker-protests-could-sway-u-s-politics

          About 44 percent of the nearly $10 million in contributions to support the protesters originated from U.S. donors, according to an Associated Press analysis of leaked donor files.

          and the Ugandan anti-gay law:

          https://globalaffairs.org/commentary-and-analysis/blogs/unholy-relationship-between-ugandas-anti-lgbtq-law-and-us

          from 2007 to 2020, over 20 US evangelical groups spent at least $54 million in Africa “to influence laws, policies, and public opinion against sexual and reproductive rights." Nearly half of that figure was spent in Uganda.


          US conservatives absolutely are interested in being involved in supporting their brand of conservatism worldwide, and considering US conservatives are the sort who regularly sport stickers like “back the blue” or “the thin blue line” flags, it would be remiss to act like the quickly ascending money for the officer isn’t politically motivated.

    • BrikoX@vlemmy.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I ignore media opinions and interpretations, I just look at the facts.