Oracle responds to Red Hat

  • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I suppose Apple uses Linux in some of their servers, so maybe. But their desktop product is Darwin so I don’t think that’s getting any votes

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed, but with that kind of licensing there’s nothing stopping them. We already found limitations of GPL with RedHat, I think all of these licenses need an overhaul

            • Jagger2097@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If they wanted their code to be sharealike, the developers could have chosen a different license. Apple is contributing more than is required so don’t complain?

              • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The point is Apple doesn’t actually want to help the community - they might be hoping that someone goes through their dumps and finds a vulnerability and reports it to them. Free community sourced labour.

                If they really wanted to help, MacOS should have been GPLv3. But we know that’s not how Apple functions.