• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      No it’s not. You need to have a trial to have legal precedent. You can’t base a legal precedent on “Those other times were the same I reckon.”

      Lazy, wrong bullshit like this gets 7 upvotes, how? Brigading.

      • Arete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yup you’re right of course. It was a throwaway reply to someone clearly arguing in bad faith. While it isn’t legal precedent, it is a fairly compelling defense.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It is not in any way compelling unless you’re just looking for excuses. Take your bad faith genocide apologia to someone gullible enough for it.

          EDIT: Also just take a moment to notice how fucking wild it is that “Yeah, I was totally wrong but the other guy was also wrong I reckon so it’s fine also I think what I said was good actually,” was their defense. That sure was a bunch of words they said.

          Again, the fact anybody liked this comment is a definite sign of brigading.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s one of most basic things about Law that merelly “somebody else did the same and got away with it” isn’t at all a valid defense.

          The act itself is lawful or unlawful, quite independently of other people having done the same and gotten away with it.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Good luck with the “those other guys did it too and didn’t get a ticket” argumentation in a Court of Law when you try to contest a speeding ticket…

      “It was done before and never taken to court” does not create a legal precedent and even if taken to court, it requires a high enough court and it’s specifically about interpreting certain points of Law, so merelly “A similar situation yielded Not Guilty” means nothing.