• lemmylommy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    The authors argue:

    • Nitrogen execution forces prisoners to participate in their own death, which they consider cruel

    • Delivery by mask is unproven and could lead to problems (like CO2 buildup).

    • the protocol is heavily redacted and many other executions have been botched before, which does not inspire confidence.

    • a lack of oxygen can lead to convulsions, which can prolong the execution if the airways are affected

    • in case of a failed execution the prisoner is entitled to medical help. This could be difficult or even dangerous to administer in an environment of little to no oxygen

    • mice did show a fear response when executed with nitrogen

    While I do agree with those points and oppose lethal punishment myself, I would not expect the arguments to make a big legal difference. All of them do apply to other execution methods as well, and usually much worse. Personally, I would prefer a death by nitrogen to any other method on offer, if there is to be an execution.