Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years ago

125 House Republicans back 'life at conception' bill, no IVF exception

www.businessinsider.com

342

125 House Republicans back 'life at conception' bill, no IVF exception

www.businessinsider.com

Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years ago

An old Senate version of the bill included an exception for in vitro fertilization. Even some vulnerable Republicans have backed the hard-right bill.

Chat

fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
7·
2 years ago
You assume republicans have an ounce of consistency in their policy positions
- CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world
  link
  fedilink
  arrow-up
  2·
  2 years ago
  They’re pretty consistent about doing whatever benefits them most. Otherwise, nah.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• Business News

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

community_visibility: public

public_blurb

143 users / day
1.46K users / week
5.62K users / month
2.9K users / 6 months
number_of_local_subscribers
17.4K subscribers
3.71K Posts
95.6K Comments
Modlog