A cargo ship that was struck by a Houthi ballistic missile on Monday has created an 18-mile long oil slick in the Red Sea as it continues to take on water, two US officials said Friday.

The M/V Rubymar — a Belize-flagged, UK-registered, Lebanese-owned vessel — was carrying 41,000 tons of fertilizer when it was struck on Monday by one of two ballistic missiles fired from Houthi territory in Yemen.

US Central Command said the ship is currently anchored as it takes on water. “The Houthis continue to demonstrate disregard for the regional impact of their indiscriminate attacks, threatening the fishing industry, coastal communities, and imports of food supplies,” US Central Command said.

  • Landsharkgun@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    Israel wouldn’t have a single fricking bullet without the funding of the US and other Western powers. It is very much America that is committing genocide in Palestine, we’re just letting someone else’s finger pull the trigger.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If they didn’t have the funding they would all be dead already because they are regularly under fire from rockets. Not only now, but also before the last attack of the Hamas.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s also someone else aiming the gun. You don’t charge the guy in Walmart for a customer shooting someone.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Actually if you supply weapons to people knowing they will murder others with them you will be held responsible.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          But if you supply them under the knowledge they will “defend themselves”, that doesn’t put you in trouble.

          Not saying I agree with Israel or the US providing them weapons, but there’s a bit of (perhaps bullshit) plausible deniability involved, and also the US is Israel’s ally so they’re supposed to support them in some manner (although I would say this should stop at providing naval support and generally protecting trade through the region, rather than providing weapons that are obviously being used for genocide).

          It must also be remembered that these are not donations, even though politicians seem to frame them that way. Weapons and support is provided under bilateral aid agreements - it is a two way deal, and one that almost always favours the country that’s giving. Israel is effectively taking out long term loans with the US to buy weapons.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Pleading ignorance worked wonders during Neurenberg trials right? Just following orders or something?