Woods argued the “dirty secret” is that customers weren’t willing to pay for the added cost of cleaner fossil fuels.

In his comments Tuesday, Woods argued the “dirty secret” is that customers weren’t willing to pay for the added cost of cleaner fossil fuels.

Referring to carbon capture, Woods said Exxon has “tabled proposals” with governments “to get out there and start down this path using existing technology.”

“People can’t afford it, and governments around the world rightly know that their constituents will have real concerns,” he added.

“So we’ve got to find a way to get the cost down to grow the utility of the solution, and make it more available and more affordable, so that you can begin the [clean energy] transition.”

For example, he said Exxon “could, today, make sustainable aviation fuel for the airline business. But the airline companies can’t afford to pay.”

  • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    respectfully, how is it our fault that oil, that has been around for more longer hence it is more, cheaper than renewable alternatives?

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Not to mention that these bastards knew something had to be done decades ago because they themselves looked into it but they used that early warning to delay, delay and delay, so they could continue earning maximum profits down to the last second, and then a good few years past that.

      And what the fuck is this guy smoking? “Clean” fossil fuels? No, you realized your business would not survive in a world where this problem gets dealt with, so you actively sabotaged the ability of your own species to pick up on the problem.

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is an old tactic, and it’s been used by the oil industry before.

      Plastics are polluting our environment? “It’s not the industry’s fault. It’s because individuals litter and don’t recycle. No need to have the government regulate the industry.”

      If they can convince people that it’s their fault, then there is no need for industry to change.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Even if it were 100% the case that this was the fault of individuals, sounds like the government should be regulating the industry to cease producing plastic for which it’s a problem if people litter.