The president has been going after his presumptive 2024 opponent with a little more venom than usual

Joe Biden is taking it to Donald Trump.

The president’s campaign responded to Trump’s wild press conference in New York on Monday by slamming the former president as “weak and desperate — both as a man and a candidate for President.”

“He spent the weekend golfing, the morning comparing himself to Jesus, and the afternoon lying about having money he definitely doesn’t have,” the statement read, adding that “America deserves better than a feeble, confused, and tired Donald Trump.”

  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    He was not convicted of rape.

    And if you compare what biden allegedly did to what trump allegedly did, Bidens accusation seems much more accurate. It actually had colloborating evidence at the time, vs no evidence against trump.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      The judge in the case said Trump was convicted of rape. There are no credible accusations against Biden. You are repeating lies.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Please tell me one of the juror names in the trump rape conviction.

        Why dont you believe women when they claim they are raped?

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The jurors are anonymous as is common in trials where the defendant has a history of calling for violence against people he views as his enemies.

          I believe women who take their rapists to court.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Jurors are allowed to disclose if they were on a case. So you are saying that there was a case he was convicted in by a jury?

            Gotcha, so women that are too embarrassed, or dont want the public scrutiny are just liars then? Really?!?

        • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          No thank you. I don’t like to engage too much with people who can’t be bothered to proof-read their own posts.

          Nor do I enjoy discussions with people who are so assured of their own self-righteousness that they ignore documented facts in lieu of their own personal opinions.

          It just so happens that I also don’t much enjoy arguing with people who have a documented public history of arguing in bad faith.