roon@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoHilariouslemmy.mlimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1956arrow-down133file-text
arrow-up1923arrow-down1imageHilariouslemmy.mlroon@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEunieIsTheBus@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up65·1 year agoPoint four was the first thing I immediately noticed.
minus-squareSolivine@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·1 year agoTechnically 102 if you include the one already said
minus-squareEunieIsTheBus@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up22·1 year agoNo, they explicitely demanded the 100 times after the say-i-am-sorry-once-routine terminated
minus-squareSolivine@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 year agoIt wasn’t explicit! What if the amount of sorries is stored in a global state? She didn’t necessarily specify 100 more sorries. Women so confusing smh.
minus-squareibasaw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoforever scarred by OBO errors… I noticed that too
Point four was the first thing I immediately noticed.
Technically 102 if you include the one already said
No, they explicitely demanded the 100 times after the say-i-am-sorry-once-routine terminated
It wasn’t explicit! What if the amount of sorries is stored in a global state? She didn’t necessarily specify 100 more sorries. Women so confusing smh.
forever scarred by OBO errors… I noticed that too