empireOfLove@lemmy.one to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoThreads Has Lost More Than 80% of Its Daily Active Usersgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1191arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkThreads Has Lost More Than 80% of Its Daily Active Usersgizmodo.comempireOfLove@lemmy.one to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square30fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareBlameThePeacock@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up73·1 year agoI’d argue that the initial sign up week people should not be classified as “daily active users” Lots of people will check something out when it launches, I’d only start measuring actual usage after a month or two.
minus-squareHelix 🧬@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·1 year agoBut shareholders want big numbers.
minus-squareworfamerryman@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 year agoI don’t know what your talking about 80% is pretty big.
minus-squareSchedar@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoexactly what I was thinking. That big starting number is misleading at best.
minus-squarestoiclime@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoAnd 80 percent of over 100 million users is still 20-30m active users.
minus-squareBlameThePeacock@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou’re bad at math (or more likely bad at wording things properly), 80% of 100million is 80 million…
I’d argue that the initial sign up week people should not be classified as “daily active users” Lots of people will check something out when it launches, I’d only start measuring actual usage after a month or two.
But shareholders want big numbers.
I don’t know what your talking about 80% is pretty big.
exactly what I was thinking. That big starting number is misleading at best.
And 80 percent of over 100 million users is still 20-30m active users.
You’re bad at math (or more likely bad at wording things properly), 80% of 100million is 80 million…