Employers offering remote and hybrid work options hire new talent more quickly than companies making employees to return to the office.
  • Xenxs@lemmy.world
    261·
    1 year ago

    For double the salary, I’d need to think long and hard about it tbh.

    • moriquende@lemmy.world
      9·
      1 year ago

      For me it would heavily depend on where the office is located relative to my apartment, and how long my commute would turn out to be. More than 15-20 minutes by bike is a no-go (I live in Europe).

      Also assuming the requirement to be in the office isn’t a huge red flag for bad management in the first place.

      • Xenxs@lemmy.world
        1·
        1 year ago

        Well obviously the commute should be within a reasonable distance, I wouldn’t spend 5 hours a day in a car or train for it. But let’s say the total time spend back and forth is about 1,5 - 2 hours total. I feel that’s worth the time spend for a hypothetical double salary.

        Obligatory presence in the office is indeed a red flag if it doesn’t actually provide a benefit to the role. To clarify, I’m 100% WFH in Denmark so I’m not advocating to push people into an office building but there’s definitely a point where nearly everyone would go into the office full-time, if salary and benefits are high enough.