• prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Government officials either owned or had friends own office buildings and it made monetary sense for them to force workers back to the offices.

    Even that is sunk-cost fallacy. If they own the buildings, that means they’re already paid for. The only money they lose is theoretical and non-existent.

    • reddwarf@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some collect rent from sub companies, some have fears of devaluation of buildings if not occupied, etc. Plenty of angles where the lost money.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Right, theoretical money. “Opportunity cost.” They’re not losing anything, they’re missing out on potentially making more.

        Boo hoo

        • reddwarf@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey, I agree. It is about corrupt officials and businesses who want to make more. I’m not burning a candle for the (perceived) plight of these monsters 😀