Children’s sugar consumption halved since tax announcement, study finds
www.theguardian.com
Experts say success soft drinks shows expansion of tax to cover other foods and drinks is a ‘no brainer’
    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      0·
      2 years ago

      That’s why I favor outright banning added sugars, or even better, improve their lives so much that they don’t want to fill the void with sugar.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          0·
          2 years ago

          Well to start, everything that’s included in this sugar tax. Does anyone really need this garbage?

          But really, it’s more important to give people lives that are good so they don’t get sucked in to unhealthy behaviors.

          Give people something to live for any they won’t kill themselves.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            0·
            2 years ago

            How is banning sweet food in its entirety supposed to help give people something to live for? It only makes life shitter

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              0·
              2 years ago

              Not what I said.

              I said I prefer a ban instead of a tax. A tax just bans sugar for the poor. A ban effects everyone, so it’s fair and more effective.

              But also, the optimum solution instead of a tax or a ban would be to make people’s lives better so they don’t kill themselves.