My mom is in assisted living and I have a suspicion that the staff, or perhaps a resident, is taking her money. I need something that won’t look out of place and isn’t easily disabled, maybe it plays possum when unplugged but has battery backup. Anyone have any advice?

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    That seems completely reasonable. I, personally, would support such a stance from any care home. If you don’t trust us enough to broach a subject with us I wouldn’t want you as a client.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      That seems completely reasonable.

      It seems completely unreasonable to me. If a person wants a security camera in their home, they should be allowed to have one.

      Thinking of that room as your staff’s workplace makes me wonder if you’ve forgotten it’s also someone’s home.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is not their home. Period.

        In your home you can also install a cooktop/hot plate, light a candle, paint the walls any colour you like. All of which you are not allowed to do in a nursing home.

        And it is not the patient who wants the camera, it’s a relative. And even in your home a hidden camera that monitors a family members toilet/bathroom would be very much illegal in most jurisdictions,even more so if the family members may be unable to decide on that matter competently.

        Additionally it is a workplace. For professionals. Tbh: In almost all industrial nations it’s far easier to find another client than find another carer. And due to all the causes I already mentioned in this topic almost all carers will be very uncomfortable with this situation - because,well they care about their clients a lot. And that also includes the dignity of their patients.

        • Birdie@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          His mom is in assisted living, not a nursing home. My mom is also in assisted living. She’s got a stove in her apartment, she can cook her own meals if she wants to! Until recently, she could drive herself to Walmart if she felt like it. She has decorated her apartment in her own style because–get this–it’s her home!!

          Plus he hasn’t said one thing about pointing a camera at his mother’s bathroom!

          It is her home. How disheartening to see you think it isn’t.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, it is someone’s home… and in this specific incidence it is a third party trying to install a camera. There is nothing in the post that says the mother has requested to be filmed in her most intimate setting.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is simply an issue of humanity as well - nursing care is an immensely private issue for most people.

      Not many adults would want to be filmed when he/she is getting their diapers changed after they soiled themselves accidentally. If you ask most older folks they don’t even want their kids/relatives to be doing that out of shame. Most wouldn’t want their kids/relatives to even be present. (Note: This is highly dependent on the culture, though, I can only speak for Western&Arab clients here)

      Now imagine being the patient and not even knowing whether someone is watching. Besides - we often don’t know enough about the actual relationship between the kids and the client. I’ve seen old folks agree to a lot of shit simply because of pressure (“I won’t come and visit you anymore if you don’t sign this”), extortion (“I only bring the grandkids of you wire me amount XY”) or downright abuse.

      The later is also an issue: There are perverts all around the net. I know of at least one instance when a hidden camera (in that case placed by nurse) was used to stream nursing situation to a fetish site on the net. Thankfully by sheer luck the whole operation failed spectacularly before any harm was done.

      (The nurse placed the cam while the patient was away to dialysis. The patient collapsed there and sadly passed away in hospital. The nurse was unable to retrieve the camera due to being quarantined due to COVID. A relative who was either in IT sec or a LEO-i can’t remember -of the patient removed the belongings and found the camera. Nurse caught themselves on cam when installing the cam and was charged, sentenced to two years on probation, a high fine and banned from ever working in a care job again. The only reason why no actual prison sentence was handed out was the confession which helped in a larger case.)

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Damn, that nurse/camera story is truly disgusting - but sadly, like you say, these people do exist. Imagine being an intensely private and reserved person your whole life - then one of your kids decides to film you 24/7. I’d be mortified if that was me.

        • philpo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Just talked to a friend about it - he is head of a nursing home group in Central Europe.

          He had multiple cases when they had relatives trying to do that. Funnily enough the main reason cited by the relatives was to stop other relatives from “doing something funny about the will” .

          They actually have a policy when they place a hidden camera in cases of alleged property theft - but this is done in conjunction with the client, their relatives (if not the target), sometimes the court and done by a professional company in a way that the actual patient is not part of the picture/not compromised. (And it’s paid for by the facility - they don’t want a rotten apple as well)

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s seems like a well thought out policy with appropriate checks and balances built in. It would be hard to argue against this being the best of a bad situation.