Article III Section 1 of the Wisconsin Constitution currently reads, “Every United States citizen age 18 or older who is a resident of an election district in this state is a qualified elector of that district.”

After Tuesday’s vote, the article will now read, “Only a United States citizen age 18 or older who is a resident of an election district in this state is a qualified elector of that district.”

Doesn’t this change the meaning of the statement so much that it’s no longer true that every citizen of age who is a resident is eligible to vote? Can this new language be interpreted by courts and lawmakers such that anyone can be disenfranchised if such malicious laws can be passed in the state?

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    What did change was the explicit exclusion of people outside of those qualifiers.

    That’s not the point. Don’t focus on the logical conditions, because they have not changed.

    As far as I understand it, the important change is the missing “Every”.

    Before, the “every” had made this a guaranteed right. Now that is gone, and only conditions are left.

    The right to vote could be taken away from some people by creating further conditions in the future.