Yes, believable, from all the payment methods available, Greenpeace would choose the most fucking inefficient one, that wastes 700 kWh for a single transaction, that’s 100 households!

  • Magnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    please explain how to transfer bitcoin without mining a block, since the transactions are contained there.

    You need to take the energy required to mine a block and validate it (a lot, could power a small town), then divide for the few transactions that could be included in just 1 mb.

    They impose a size limit on the transactions that can be included, so even if tomorrow the transactions increase 10x, each block could contain the same limited number. Of course, if you only count the electricity used by your machine to send the transaction, it’s just a few milliwatts. The problem is all the garbage calculations that need to be done to actually validate it.

    • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re arguing in bad faith and I’m not going to put up with your stupid straw man. Your statement was that it requires 700 kilowatt hours for a single transaction and that is blatantly false. You seem to ignore the obvious fact that Bitcoin can be transferred unlimited number of times and you do not have to re-mine the Bitcoin every single time you transfer it. As I said earlier, I already agree with you that Bitcoin sucks and you’re wasting your time arguing with me over semantics.

      • Magnetic_dud@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Can you do a transfer without mining a block?

        No, it needs to be included in any freshly mined block.

        Can you include an unlimited amount of transactions in a block to minimize the wasted energy?

        No, it’s hardcoded to around 1 mb and since the average is 300 bytes, that translates to ~3000

        Can you mine a Bitcoin without wasting an immense amount of energy?

        No.

        So, by math, you take that immense amount of energy and divide by ~3000 transactions.

        You can’t just take in consideration the 3 watts used by your computer in the 300 milliseconds used to submit the transfer, need to consider the whole network

        I would be happy to learn if it’s possible to transfer them without including the transaction in a block, that would be groundbreaking and then the electricity used would be 10000x less